One advantage of such an approach is that the results, and how they depend on the model itself, can be directly scrutinized. This approach is to use an objective statistical model to attempt to separate driver performance from car performance and other key factors. However, subjective rankings are prone to bias and dependent on each individual’s subjective mental model, shaped by the races they have or have not seen or analyzed.Īn alternative approach to driver rankings has developed over the past several years. Witness the fact that Stirling Moss (no world titles) is often placed near the top of such lists. Most subjective ranking lists already do this to some degree. If our objective is to rate driver performances, then we need to somehow make allowances or corrections for a driver’s car competitiveness. Some of the most talented drivers in the sport’s history won no titles, simply because they never raced in a sufficiently competitive car.

To put it another way, F1 is not a level playing ground for drivers. As far as team performance goes, the driver is a relatively small contributor. Yet, as F1 fans, we recognize that the question is far more complicated.į1 is a team sport. If the only aspect we care about is the number of titles or grand prix wins, then the answer is straightforward.

Who was the greatest F1 driver of all time? It is an endlessly debated question amongst fans and pundits alike.

Top 100 models